When Jesus says he has come to bear witness to truth, Pilate responds with a most poignant question: “What is truth?” (John 18:38)
This is what we call dramatic irony. Christ himself is the way, the truth, and the life, and in him alone is truth. All aspects of truth knowable in this life are but a reflection of he who is truth.
And as the Church is the true Body of Christ, the Church is therefore the “pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15). Holy Tradition is a charismatic revelation of this truth to God’s people—as lived, received, and passed down in the life and ministry of the one holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.
But what is the nature of truth? And how should it be expressed?
For Christians, teaching is a risky and even dangerous proposition. To whom much is given, much is expected. Those who would teach others are scrutinized far above the rest. This reality weighs heavily on my conscience (with a website like this), as I share with others. There is a great deal of responsibility involved. Anyone with a platform to reach or influence others should take this into consideration, treading lightly.
Since truth is Christ himself, and since he is eternal life, there is nothing more noble and necessary than to be oriented towards him and to share this truth with others. But as we point others towards Christ, it is important our words be few, our arguments simple, and our egos free from arrogance. As St. Isaac the Syrian instructs, we must:
Walk before God in simplicity, and not in subtleties of the mind. Simplicity brings faith; but subtle and intricate speculations bring conceit; and conceit brings withdrawal from God.
In the Orthodox Church, the purpose of theological discourse is not originality, popularity, or novelty. Our goal is not innovation or abandoning centuries of faithful witness. On the contrary, our goal is to see ourselves united with the Mind of the Church as She is and always has been. This revelation might be progressive in the sense of how it’s related to us through history, language, and culture, but the essential truths are ever the same, since “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and unto ages of ages” (Heb. 13:8).
While Orthodox theology has usually tended towards the apophatic or “negative”—preferring to claim what is not true about God, rather than what is—this is not a license for either idle speculation or obscurity. Unfortunately, most academic theology today strays from orthodoxy in its predilection for uncertainty.
In his own day, St. Augustine laments “the Academics”:
Before my baptism I wrote, first of all, against the Academics or about the Academics, so that, with the most forceful reasons possible, I might remove from my mind—because they were disturbing me—their arguments which in many men instill a despair of finding truth and prevent a wise man from giving assent to anything or approving anything at all as clear and certain, since to them everything seems obscure and uncertain. —The Retractations 1.1.1
This bears a striking resemblance to academics in our present context. And yet Orthodox Tradition insists on certainty. The fathers set forth a number of explanations of the world that defy both logic and reason, that are yet neither illogical nor unreasonable. They are spiritual truths that go deeper than what is apparent, and they are truths that edify more than anything science will ever theorize. These explanations might not satisfy the Academy, but they are light and life for our souls.
For example, as far as the Church is concerned, the earth is usually flat. As far as the Church is concerned, the apostle Paul authored the letter to the Hebrews. As far as the Church is concerned, Monophysitism is a heresy, not a misunderstanding. As far as the Church is concerned, the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father, and not from the Father and the Son. As far as the Church is concerned, all bishops are equal, even if one presides in love among his brothers. As far as the Church is concerned, there are a number of historical events that actually happened, and a number of people who actually exist. As far as the Church is concerned, there is one—and only one—apostolic, catholic, and eternal Church of God.
But for the Academy and her stewards—whether Orthodox, Catholic, or Protestant—such claims are not sufficient. Most of the time, certainty is rejected and even mocked. The Academy finds these matters far from clear, open to discussion and speculation.
But if our goal is to point others to the incarnate Truth of Jesus Christ—and not to earn academic credentials—then our mission should be plain:
[T]he preaching of the holy Apostles, those who followed them, and all preachers of the Gospel in general has consisted of a simple presentation of the truth, without any philosophizing. St. Paul the Apostle says of himself that his speech and preaching were not with enticing words of man’s wisdom, but in the simple telling of salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, Who was crucified on the Cross (cf. 1 Cor. 2:2–4). One could say that this is the most natural method of action through the Word: to depict the truth as it is, not cluttering it with intellectual concepts and especially speculation about probabilities …
Truth is akin to the spirit. When it is uttered simply and sincerely, truth finds the spirit. When it is surrounded by images and is figurative and embellished, it remains in the imagination. When it is encumbered with concepts and arguments, it is detained in the intellect or soul, not reaching the spirit, which is left empty. One could say that all unfruitful preaching is on account of the intellectualizing that fills it. Just explain the truth in a simple way; say what it is, and the spirit will be overcome. —St. Theophan the Recluse
Those in league with the Academy are seemingly ashamed by the simplicity of truth. For them, not everything is as it seems. The simple is devalued, while the extravagant or obscure is endeared. But in the Orthodox Church, we really do believe in certainties. There are things to be believed, known, and even understood.
While deeper truths of God are beyond our comprehension, this doesn’t mean up is down and black is white. It doesn’t mean that for every simple, straightforward, and ancient claim, the Church should be treated with skepticism. Not every simple truth should be torn apart by the seeds of doubt or obfuscation. Objecting to the Church in this way is no different than the dragon’s deception in Eden: “Has God really said…?”
And like that ancient serpent, the Academy disputes the Church when told anything they don’t like. But truth isn’t what we want to believe or what we’d prefer to be the case. Anyone walking that fine line between academic study and a faithful Christian life would do well to keep this in mind.