Mary, The Woman

An Orthodox Icon of Saint Luke painting the first Icon of the Mother of GodJust as our Lord Jesus Christ is the true and Second Adam — the true man, through whom all humanity can become truly human — so also is Mary, the Mother of God (Theotokos) the true and second Eve. She is The Woman, through whose womb was salvation and the restoration of the cosmos to be wrought.

We see Jesus call upon his mother in this way in the Gospel According to John:

“And the wine failing, the mother of Jesus saith to him: ‘They have no wine.’ And Jesus saith to her: ‘Woman, what is that to me and to thee? my hour is not yet come.’ His mother saith to the waiters: ‘Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye.’”
According to John 2:3-5 (Douay Rheims)

While some interpret this passage through modern language and culture — wrongly believing that Jesus has “rebuked” his own mother (which is a blasphemous accusation) — what Jesus is saying here is actually a great sign of respect. And indeed, Jesus obeys his mother, and does exactly as she says. The Mother of God in turn gives us the most important of precepts as followers of Christ: “Do whatever He tells you.”

Continue reading

Hard to Be (a Christian)

David Bazan is an indie-rock musician that once fronted and originated a musical group called “Pedro the Lion,” an easy-listening indie band with some distinctly religious overtones.

David grew up in a typical, evangelical, Protestant family in America, and the faith of his childhood came through in most of his music (whether explicitly or subtly), even when he was being snarky or contrary (often merely for the sake of being snarky and contrary, it seems). When he shuffled off to a solo career a few years ago, his music took a decidedly post-Christian direction and his lyrics and beliefs are now seemingly anti-Christian and a platform for “writing off” his once-adored childhood faith. One such song (that is a great song, from a purely musical and artistic standpoint), called “Hard to Be” makes his de-formation rather clear:

Fresh from the soil, we were beautiful and true
In control of our emotions, ’til we ate the poison fruit

And now it’s hard to be a decent human being

Wait just a minute, you expect me to believe
That all this misbehaving grew from one enchanted tree?

And helpless to fight it, we should all be satisfied
With this magical explanation for why the living die?

And why it’s hard to be a decent human being

Continue reading

Jesus is the Temple

Jesus Cleanses the TempleThe Holy Gospel According to John is the most “mystical” of all the holy scriptures.

In fact, this book is so “deep” and filled with Mystery that the Church only reads it during the Paschal season (there are no catechumens left, all having been baptized on Holy Saturday), as it should not be shared with the uninitiated.

It shows an absolute disregard for the sanctity of the scriptures (and a lack of understanding or historical grounding) that people would today use this particular Gospel as an “evangelization tool.” But, I digress.

One of the central themes (and it would be easy to identify dozens of “central” themes) of this Gospel is that Jesus Christ has recreated the Temple in Himself (and therefore in the Church, as the Body of Christ). There are many scholarly places where this subject has been poured over in great detail (listed at the end of this post for further reading, should you so desire). As usual, my hope is to “boil it down” for everyone to see and understand as easily as possible.

In John’s Gospel, we not only see the Temple recreated through the ministry and miracles of Christ, but also a fulfillment of the three great feasts of the Temple’s liturgical, annual cycle: Pentecost, Passover and Tabernacles (in addition, the feast of Dedication, which began in the time of the Maccabean revolt). It is during these great feasts that Christ performs the seven “signs,” and each of these signs in turn teach us about both Baptism and the Eucharist, as well.

Continue reading

The Septuagint and Textual Criticism

ScrollsTextual Criticism is a discipline that has gained much popularity over the last one hundred years or so, especially as related to the so-called “Bible” of the Christian faith.

While this discipline has arguably been around since at least the late middle ages, there has seemingly been a distinct emphasis (among particular scholars, notably “liberal” Protestants) placed upon the Christian scriptures in recent decades.

I believe this concern and their approach is motivated by a number of factors — none of which are compatible with nor do they find their home within traditional, orthodox and catholic Christianity.

It has been said that “the business of textual criticism is to produce a text as close as possible to the original.” Given this raw and simplistic definition, we can make a few observations regarding this discipline within the context of the holy scriptures. And, as a point of emphasis, the existence and usage of the Septuagint (LXX hereafter) by Christ and the apostles (and the Orthodox, catholic Church) sheds both important and transformative light on this entire enterprise. Of the latter, I will make a few brief remarks and notes as well.

Continue reading

Sanctioning Idolatry

The Seventh Ecumenical Council in NicaeaLet’s be honest — most converts to the Orthodox Faith that have arrived from an evangelical or Protestant background are faced with quite a challenge when it comes to the subject of Icons.

There is the initial “creeped out” phase that associates them with idolatry or some strange form of “eastern” sorcery and magic. There is the phase of acceptance and reluctance to acknowledge them as you walk on past them into the nave. And finally (hopefully), there is the phase of acceptance, where you go online and immediately purchase thirty of your favorite Saints’ Icons and place them all over your house or assemble a massive Bright Corner that is the highlight of your living room (and which scares your family and non-Orthodox friends when they stop by to visit). Eventually, the convert comes to accept them as part of our Church’s Sacred Tradition and they are incorporated into one’s lifestyle of faith and belief.

Continue reading

Precious Stones and Stars in the Sky

ChosenThe High Priest of Israel entered into the holiest recesses of the Temple while wearing a breastplate (Hebrew חֹשֶׁן or “choshen“) adorned with precious stones and jewels, along with the mysterious Urim and Thummim. The scriptures record:

“And you shall make an oracle of judgments [...] And you shall interweave in it a four-rowed, stone-holding web. A row of stones shall be sardius, topaz and emerald, the first row, and the second row carbuncle and lapis lazuli and jasper, and the third row ligurion and agate and amethyst, and the fourth row chrysolite and beryl and onyx, covered around by gold, bounded up together in gold; let them be according to their row. And let the stones  be from the names of the sons of Israel, twelve corresponding to their names; let them be engraving of seals, each corresponding to the name for the twelve tribes.”
Exodus (28:15,17-21 LXX)

There are several interesting things going on here, all of which have far-reaching implications.

Continue reading

The Temple Cult in Second Temple Judaism

The Second Temple, with Herod's improvements

Continuing with some more studies in second temple Judaism, it is interesting to note that the Judaism of Christ’s day and before was not like the (unrelated) Judaism of today, with the emphasis on the synagogue and the text of scripture. In fact, textual study as a discipline or way of life for anyone but the scribes/priests was unheard of prior to the second century AD on any wide scale.

“It is natural that people often assume that Judaism in the Second Temple period was more or less like contemporary Judaism, in which people meet weekly or even more frequently in synagogues to pray, worship and hear the Bible read [...] Yet the Judaism of pre-70 times was formally structured in a quite different way from the Judaism of later times. The main religious institution was the Jerusalem temple, and temple worship went back many centuries in Jewish and Israelite history. The temple was not the same as a synagogue. The main activity in the temple was blood sacrifice.”
Lester L. Grabbe, An Introduction to Second Temple Judaism, p. 40

Continue reading

Symbol / Devil

The TransfigurationOne of the most distinguished characteristics of the Orthodox Church is the nuanced (some might say “eastern” or “Greek”) understanding of “symbol” that is transcendant and goes beyond mere externals or the recesses of one’s brain. The concept of “symbol” for most people in the west today is — in the words of the reposed Fr Alexander Schmemann: “an illustration whose purpose can be termed pedagogic or educational.” In other words, a symbol merely points to or teaches about an idea or concept, but offers no real or transcendant connection to anything beyond itself. In Orthodoxy, however, a symbol is a gateway or “window” to something beyond itself; it is something that truly connects the person with the thing signified.

I’m sure most of my readers have heard the phrase “windows to heaven” applied to Icons (the devotional “artwork” or paintings of the Orthodox Church). While many in the west today would be uncomfortable with this insinuation, I actually find it to be quite soft. It doesn’t really emphasize enough just how vital the connection is between the “symbol” (or “Icon;” Greek “eikon“) and that which is symbolized. When I think of looking through a “window,” I don’t think of a real connection or experience of that which is on the other side — it is a mere contemplation or observation of these things. With Icons (or other religious symbols), on the other hand, the connection and experience of that which is depicted is real, transcendant and even transformative.

What’s most intriguing (especially for those not fluent in Greek) is that the opposite of symbol (symbolos) in Greek is the word for “division” or “separation” — diabolos. That’s right — devil. Separation/dis-unity and “devil” are synonymous, both in concept and in the personification of Satan and his fallen angels. One can see this in a number of ways in sacred scripture, as well. For example, the consequence of sin is death, which is another way of stating “separation” or “division” from God, Who is Life. When Christ promised the apostles that the Church would never be prevailed against, He intimated that the enemy at the gates was “the gates of Hades” — that is, the gates of death or the gates of schism/division.

Continue reading